Politicizing the Government Gets Personal

Now I have an even better idea of what those fired US Attorneys went through.  Why?  Because the US Justice Department discriminated against me because I'm a Democrat:

From the AP:


Report: Justice Dept. passed over Dems, liberals

WASHINGTON - Ivy Leaguers and other top law students were rejected for plum Justice Department jobs two years ago because of their liberal leanings or objections to Bush administration politics, a government report concluded Tuesday.

In one case, a Harvard Law student was passed over after criticizing the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. In another, a Georgetown University student who had previously worked for a Democratic senator and congressman didn't make the cut.

I have good reason to believe that I was one of those "top law students" evidently passed over.


As early as 2002, career Justice employees complained to department officials that Bush administration political appointees had largely taken over the hiring process for summer interns and so-called Honors Program jobs for newly graduated law students. For years, job applicants had been judged on their grades, the quality of their law schools, their legal clerkships and other experiences.

But in 2002, many applicants who identified themselves as Democrats or were members of liberal-leaning organizations were rejected while GOP loyalists with fewer legal skills were hired, the report found. Of 911 students who applied for full-time Honors jobs that year, 100 were identified as liberal -- and 80 were rejected. By comparison, 46 were identified as conservative, and only four didn't get a job offer.

The political filtering of applicants ebbed for the three years between 2003 and 2005, the inquiry found, then resumed by 2006.

Of 602 Honors candidates that year, 150 were identified as liberal -- including 83 who were cut. Five of 28 self-described conservatives were rejected.

I made it through two rounds of interviews for entrance into DOJ's Honors Program in 2002.  I was told I was a finalist for a position, until in the final round I was interviewed by some grey-bearded guy who I had previously never met and who I was told had final say over all Honors Program hires.  There was nothing overly political about the interview, nor did I self identify as a Democrat.  A simple Google search using my name, however, would have easily shown my political allegiances.  Ultimately, they hired someone else.  I'm happy I didn't get the job, as I've found the private sector to be very rewarding professionally (as well as financially).  Still, though, I worked my ass off to get in the door at Justice and am disheartened to find out now, years later, that I may not have been properly judged on my own merits.

I shouldn't worry, though.  I'm sure the crooks responsible are getting what they deserve:


Although federal law prohibits discriminating against government job applicants based on their politics, it's unlikely that any of those involved in the hiring process will be penalized since they no longer work at the department. A Justice official said the department is not considering pressing criminal charges or taking or civil actions against them.

Oh wait.

Disgusting.

You can read the full story here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080624/ap_o n_go_ca_st_pe/justice_inquiry_hiring



Display:


This are glaring examples (2.00 / 2)


of why it is truly a fierce urgency of now , to stop the rabid partisanship.

If partisans in DEM party are in charge of the justice department, do you see any different outcome?
It is the fierce urgency of now, that we ask our party members, elected officials, candidates- STOP the partisanship in Washington.   " A person who disagrees w/ me 20% of the time , is my 80% friend"


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:25:46 PM EST

Re: This are glaring examples (none / 0)

I haven't seen any evidence of this sort of thing happening in Democratic adminstrations.  This isn't just unethical; its against the law.


by XoFalconXo on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:27:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This are glaring examples (2.00 / 2)

There is plenty of favoritism in many forms in both parties.

Giving earmarks to help your sister and brother in law to the tunes of millions, is not less of a law broken . Unless we are grading levels among them.

mark my words: We saw repub president + repub congress + repub senate = Abosulte power.  

Absolute power corrupts absolutely..

and if you think we have choir boys and girls in the dem party , now when it will be a

dem president+ dem senate+ dem congress ( majorities).  

You are kidding yourself.

Thats why we need to work as hard as possible in not kissing their ass, rather holding their feet to the fire.


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This are glaring examples (none / 0)

agreed


The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:12:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This are glaring examples (none / 0)

I'm fine with holding their feet to the fire, but I'm still in favor of scrubbing the federal government of every last one of these Republican crooks, cronies, and good old boys.


by XoFalconXo on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:14:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This are glaring examples (none / 0)

Wrong. Traditionally the management of programs like this were in the hands of career DOJ employees. They have now been put back in those hands and the Democrats will not be changing that. This comment sounds like it comes from a Republican trying to justify what was a grossly egregious violation of the public trust.


by ottovbvs on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 08:52:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The worst part is... (2.00 / 1)

You'll never know.

Speaking from personal experience, it's not that you didn't get it. It's that you'll never know whether you should have gotten it, because no one's going to review your specific case. I can take losing in a fair fight. But losing because it was rigged against you? It just diminishes all the fighting that it took to get yourself to the decision.

It just always sits as a nagging thought in the back of your head, in the pile of "shoulda, woulda, coulda"s, even if you end up just fine or better off without it.


by TCQuad on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:26:59 PM EST

Re: The worst part is... (2.00 / 1)

Right.  I can take being beaten out by someone more qualified or, hell, even someone who just had a better interview.  But this is terrible.

I would have preferred they just came out and said "we're not going to hire you because you're a liberal."  I feel like an idiot for playing along with their dog and pony show.


by XoFalconXo on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:30:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (2.00 / 1)

Incidentally, the position I was interviewing for was in the division responsible for prosecuting violations of federal whistleblower protection laws.

No worries.  I'm sure whatever hack they gave the position to prosecuted those matters aggressively.


by XoFalconXo on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:37:43 PM EST

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (2.00 / 1)

This is what worries me as much as anything. How in the world will they ever clear out the bad apples and incompetent appointees that the Bush administration put into the bureaucracy?


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:42:15 PM EST

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (2.00 / 1)

Right.  We're talking about kids (like me) who are under 30.  Those guys aren't going anywhere for a long time.


by XoFalconXo on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:45:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

blech - corruption at its worst. (2.00 / 1)


"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather Boa!" Allen Ginsberg
by canadian gal on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:43:13 PM EST

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (2.00 / 2)

that sucks- ughh. you probably wouldn't have liked working for a bunch of biased hacks anyways.


by alyssa chaos on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:46:31 PM EST

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (none / 0)

Yeah, I suppose my prosecutorial discretion would have been nil.  Its all Democratic witch-hunts, all the time.


by XoFalconXo on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:21:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (2.00 / 3)

I am constantly stunned by what Republicans get by with. Between the Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr, and Jr administrations, we have a mix of some of the most heinous crimes imaginable. I remember reading years ago that the Reagan era had the record for indictment of any administration in history. I do not know if that still stands, but I do know that the republican house and senate authorized in excess of 50 million dollars to investigate Clinton. Please someone, tell me what Ken Starr found. No wait, I remember, and it is not even worth mentioning.

Now we have someone IMHO who was never even elected. I am certain that this administration has committed almost every crime imaginable. You have just named one. The list is discussed every day and yet we do nothing. No one is punished, not really. Who do you think is guilty of trying to destroy our Constitutional rights? Who do you think is guilty of war crimes? Who do you think is responsible for the destruction of our education system? Good jobs and decent health care, where have they gone? WTF is going on?

I have felt that this administration has basically raped and pillaged our country. So please, someone tell me, what the frack are we going to do about this?


The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 11:48:47 PM EST

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (none / 0)

Democrats don't do a damn thing about it because "thats in the past, lets look to the future" and "we don't play those types of partisan games."  Well, thats garbage.  If someone commits a crime, you prosecute him.

Isn't it ironic that the Justice Department just releases the results of an investigation showing more politicization of what are supposed to be non-partisan government positions and then declines to prosecute?  Surprise, surprise.  Is this report supposed to be a sign that the problem is fixed?


by XoFalconXo on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:20:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (none / 0)

Agreed. I believe that Democrats have been co-opted and have just given in to the corporate forces that influence/control the repugs. Thus in some ways, I almost hate them as much as repugs. I actually agree with some of the crankier elements around here that want to hold Obama to the fire as well as all of our other elected Dems.

Now this does create a problem for us. The Democrats are the Big Tent Party, with wildly divergent interests. This can make us look weak and disorganized. Add to this, the capitulation of our party leaders to repugs and corporate iterests, and the fairly successful effort by the repugs to intimidate us through phony conservative movements and the MSM, the Dems DO seem very weak and disorganized.

Now, if we really want to take our country back, how do we change this?


The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:51:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Politicizing the Government Gets Personal (none / 0)

I would love to hear your opinion and anyone else's opinion regarding this issue.


The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:52:08 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.